4.5 Article

Prognostic significance of histologically detected lymph node micrometastases of sizes between 0.2 and 2 mm in colorectal cancer

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE
卷 28, 期 7, 页码 977-983

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-012-1636-y

关键词

Colorectal cancer; Lymph node; Micrometastases; Isolated tumour cells

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Minimal lymph node involvement is a potential prognostic factor in colorectal cancer. The International Union Against Cancer defined tumour deposits between 0.2 and 2 mm as micrometastases and clusters and single-cell infiltrations below this cutoff as isolated tumour cells. Nevertheless, only a minority of studies discriminated metastatic involvements according to this definition. In order to investigate the prognostic significance of micrometastases (0.2-2 mm), we performed a retrospective study enrolling 44 routinely diagnosed micrometastatic cases within 15 years which represent about 1 % of our cases. These cases have been re-evaluated. Seven of the micrometastatic cases turned out to be macrometastases after step sectioning. Complete follow-up was available in 33 remaining cases. Collections of node-negative and macrometastatic cases served as control groups. The Kaplan-Meier curves of macro- and micrometastatic cases showed a similar adverse course (p = 0.830) especially during the first 40 months. The 5-year-survival rates were 51, 60 and 64 months for macro-, micrometastatic and node-negative cases, respectively. The difference in overall survival, however, reached only a statistical trend and was not significant (p = 0.137). After re-evaluation with step sections and cytokeratin immunohistochemistry out of an initial 91 node-negative cases, 11 (12 %) cases were identified with isolated tumour cells and one (1 %) case with a micrometastasis. Our data show that micro- and macrometastatic colorectal cancers show very similar survival rates. Therefore, efforts to improve the detection of lymph node micrometastases seem to be justified.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据