4.5 Article

Electrogenic transport, oxygen consumption, and sensitivity to acute hypoxia of human colonic epithelium

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE
卷 26, 期 9, 页码 1205-1210

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-011-1215-7

关键词

Human colon; Hypoxia; Ion transport; Oxygen consumption

资金

  1. National University of Cuyo (Secretar a de Ciencia, Tecnica y Posgrado)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction It is recognized that epithelial ion transport depends on oxygen supply, but this dependence has not been characterized in the human colon in vitro despite its surgical and clinical implications. Purposes The aim of this study is to measure the oxygen consumption of colonic epithelium under conditions which preserve vectorial ion transport and to assess the sensitivity of the human colonic epithelium short-circuit current (I-sc) to acute hypoxia induced in vitro. Methods Isolated mucosa preparations from human sigmoid colon were placed in a modified Ussing chamber which allows simultaneous measurement of short-circuit current (I-sc) and oxygen consumption (QO(2)). In separate experiments, the sensitivity to acute hypoxia induced in a conventional Ussing chamber was assessed. Results Basal mean +/- SEM values (n=8) were I-sc = 3.3 +/- 0.5 mu Eq h(-1) cm(-2) and QO(2) = 8.09 +/- 0.55 mu mol h(-1) cm(-2). The contribution of the serosal side to the oxygen supply was higher than that of the mucosal side (p=0.0023). Ouabain reduced I-sc by 70% (P < 0.0001) and QO(2) by 26% (n=8; P=0.0009), suggesting that a large fraction of QO(2) is needed to support ouabain-sensitive electrogenic transport. Induction of hypoxia at both sides of the Ussing chamber caused a rapid decrease in I-sc after 2 min. I-sc was also significantly depressed when hypoxia was induced by 5 min in the serosal side (n=6, P < 0.0001), but was unaffected by hypoxia induced in the mucosal side. Conclusion The present results allow a better understanding of the clinical consequences of acute hypoxia on intestinal ion transport.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据