4.5 Article

Zinc deficiency impairs wound healing of colon anastomosis in rats

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE
卷 25, 期 2, 页码 251-257

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-009-0831-y

关键词

Colon anastomosis; Zinc deficiency; MMPs; Collagen type I/III ratio; Wound healing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Anastomotic leakage is a relevant surgical complication. The aim of the study was to investigate the influence of a controlled preoperative zinc deficiency on the extracellular matrix composition of colon anastomosis. Forty male Wistar rats were randomized to either a zinc deficiency group (n = 20) or a control group (n = 20). In each animal, a transverse colonic end-to-end anastomosis was performed. On postoperative day 7, the surface of the mucosal villi, expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) 2, 8, 9, and 13, and both the number of proliferating cells (Ki67) and apoptotic cells, as well as the collagen types I/III ratio were analyzed. Within the anastomotic area the mesenterial region and the antimesenterial region were analyzed separately. In each group, one anastomotic leakage was detected. Expression of both MMP 2, 9, and 13 was significantly higher, and expression of Ki67 was significantly reduced in the zinc deficient group both mesenterial and antimesenterial. The collagen types I/III ratio was reduced in the zinc deficiency group by trend, without statistical significance neither mesenterial nor antimesenterial. Likewise, zinc deficiency affected neither the expression of MMP 8 nor the rate of apoptotic cells, respectively. Analyses of the surface of the mucosal villi revealed no significant differences comparing the groups with neither mesenterial nor antimesenterial. Our study constitutes the known negative effect of zinc deficiency on wound healing. Zinc deficiency significantly increased the activity of MMPs (2, 9, and 13), caused a reduced collagen type I/III ratio, and delayed cell proliferation and quality of intestinal wound healing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据