4.5 Article

Male sexual function and lower urinary tract symptoms after laparoscopic total mesorectal excision

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE
卷 23, 期 12, 页码 1199-1205

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-008-0547-4

关键词

Sexual function; Lower urinary tract symptoms; Laparoscopy; Colorectal cancer; Total mesorectal excision

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to investigate sexual function and the presence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in male patients with rectal cancer following short-term radiotherapy and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LTME) by physical and psychological measurements. Sexual function and LUTS were assessed by the use of questionnaires [International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), International Prostate Symptom Score]. Sexual function was further assessed by the use of pharmaco duplex ultrasonography of the cavernous arterial blood flow and nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity monitoring (NPTR). All investigations were performed prior to the start of preoperative radiotherapy and 15 months after surgery. Nine patients (mean age 60 years) participated. Erectile function was maintained in 71% and ejaculation function in 89%. Compared with pre-operative scores on the IIEF, a significant deterioration in intercourse satisfaction was seen following radiotherapy and LTME (7.9 vs 10.3, p=0.042), but overall satisfaction remained unchanged (8.0 vs 7.0, p=0.246). NPTR parameters (duration of erectile episodes, duration of tip rigidity >= 60%) decreased following radiotherapy and LTME. Patients reported a deterioration in micturition frequency (2.0 vs 1.0, p=0.034) and quality of life due to urinary symptoms (8.0 vs 1.8, p=0.018). Based on these first preliminary findings, data suggest that 15 months after short-term radiotherapy and LTME in men with rectal cancer, objectively assessed sexual dysfunction was considerable, but overall sexual satisfaction had not changed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据