4.6 Article

Transfected synthetic DNA Enzyme Gene specifically inhibits Egr-1 gene expression and reduces Neointimal Hyperplasia following balloon injury in rats

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 129, 期 1, 页码 118-124

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.11.066

关键词

DNA enzyme; Egr-1; PCNA; TGF-beta(1); neointimal hyperplasia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Early growth response factor-1 (Egr-1) controls the gene expression involved in postangioplasty restenosis. In the present study we synthesized specific catalytic DNA targeting sequences in human Egr-1 mRNA to investigate the effects on artery balloon injury. Methods: The catalytic DNA, ED5, was synthesized and transfected into the arterial wall of Wistar rats using the FuGENE6 transfection reagent. The animals were euthanized at day 3, 7, 14 and 21 following artery balloon injury. Serum nitric oxide (NO), nitric oxide synthase (NOS), and endothelin (ET) levels were measured before sacrifice. Histopathological changes to the arterial tissue were evaluated by H&E staining and observed via transmission electromicroscopy. Egr-1, PCNA and TGF-beta 1 expression was detected by immunohistochemistry, RT-PCR, and western-blot. Results: Compared with the control groups, ED5-treated rats exhibited increased levels of both NO and NOS (p<0.05); by contrast, plasma ET levels were decreased relative to controls (p<0.05). Neointimal hyperplasia (NH) was significantly reduced and vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) in the neointima exhibited a general contractile phenotype. Both protein and mRNA expression of Egr-1, PCNA, and TGF-beta(1) in the ED5-treated group were decreased at each time point (p<0.001). Conclusions: ED5 may specifically inhibit Egr-1 gene expression and reduce NH after balloon injury in rats; the latter effect may be mediated by a down-regulation of TGF-beta(1) and up-regulation of NOS to inhibit NH following balloon injury. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据