4.7 Article

Insulin-like growth factor 2 hypomethylation of blood leukocyte DNA is associated with gastric cancer risk

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 131, 期 11, 页码 2596-2603

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.27554

关键词

DNA methylation; gastric cancer; IGF2; blood leukocyte; lifestyle

类别

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [17015013]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [20390169, AA005]
  3. Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare of Japan [00001]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20390169, 23300342, 17015013] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To determine whether or not the methylation status of blood leukocyte DNA can be used as a surrogate marker of the risk for cancer, we quantitatively determined the methylation levels of insulin-like growth factor 2 (IGF2) and TUSC3 in 299 gastric cancer cases, and 299 age- and gender-matched controls. The IGF2 methylation levels in blood leukocyte DNA of the cases were lower than those of the healthy controls and there was a significant trend of increasing gastric cancer risk with decreasing methylation level of IGF2. Patients with hypermethylated IGF2 in blood leukocyte DNA showed a significantly better survival rate than those with hypomethylated IGF2, indicating that the IGF2 methylation level in blood leukocyte DNA can be a possible marker not only of the risk for but also of the prognosis of gastric cancer. In contrast, the TUSC3 methylation level in blood leukocyte DNA was higher in the cases than in the healthy controls, but the difference was not significant. The past lifestyle and clinicopathological characteristics of the participants were analyzed for any relationship with the methylation level. With aging and smoking, methylation of IGF2 and TUSC3 decreased and increased in blood leukocyte DNA, respectively. These results indicate that the methylation level of IGF2 in blood leukocyte DNA may be used as an important surrogate marker of the risk for gastric cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据