4.7 Article

HLA-DR expression is associated with better prognosis in sporadic Australian clinicopathological Stage C colorectal cancers

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 125, 期 5, 页码 1231-1237

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.24484

关键词

colorectal cancer; HLA-DR; immunohistochemistry; microsatellite instability; prognosis

类别

资金

  1. Queensland Cancer Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Predicting patient outcome for colorectal carcinoma (CRC) with lymph node but not distant metastases remains challenging. Various prognostic markers have been identified including microsatellite instability (MSI) and possibly expression of the MHC Class II protein, HLA-DR. About 15% of sporadic CRC exhibits MSI associated with methylation of the DNA mismatch repair gene hMLH1 promoter. In addition, a significant proportion of unselected CRC demonstrates expression of HLA-DR. We sought to examine the relationship between HLA-DR expression, MSI status and prognosis in sporadic Australian Clinicopathological (ACP) Stage C CRC. Two hundred seventy consecutive patients with sporadic ACP Stage C CRC were treated at Concord Repatriation General Hospital between 1986 and 1992. None of these patients received adjuvant chemotherapy and all were followed for a minimum of 5 years or until death. DNA was extracted from paraffin sections and MSI status determined by PCR. HLA-DR expression was determined immunohistochemically using an antibody against the HLA-DR a chain. MSI status could be assigned in 235 cases: 176 CRCs (74.9%) were microsatellite stable, whereas 23 (9.8%) had high levels of MSI (MSI-H) and 36 (15.3%) had low levels of MSI (MSI-L). HLA-DR expression by CRC cells was seen in 148 (60.1%) cases and correlated with the presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (p = 0.0005) and peritumoral lymphocytes (p = 0.003), but not other clinicopathological features or MSI status. HLA-DR-positive CRCs were strongly associated with better patient outcome (p < 0.0001). (C) 2009 UICC

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据