4.6 Article

Does eating slowly influence appetite and energy intake when water intake is controlled?

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-135

关键词

Eating rate; Water; Satiation; Appetite; Visual analogue scales; Energy intake regulation

资金

  1. Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation [SFRH/BD/36838/2007]
  2. University of Rhode Island Council for Research
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/36838/2007] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Slow eating has been associated with enhanced satiation, but also with increased water intake. Therefore, the role of water ingestion in regard to eating rate needs to be discerned. This study examined the influence of eating rate on appetite regulation and energy intake when water intake is controlled. Methods: In a randomized design, slow and fast eating rates were compared on two occasions, in 30 women (22.7 +/- 1.2y; BMI=22.4 +/- 0.4kg/m(2)) who consumed an ad libitum mixed-macronutrient lunch with water (300 mL). Satiation was examined as the main outcome by measuring energy intake during meals. At designated times, subjects rated hunger, satiety, desire-to-eat, thirst, and meal palatability on visual analogue scales. Paired t-tests were used to compare hypothesis-driven outcomes. Appetite ratings were compared across time points and conditions by repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) using a within-subject model. Results: Energy intake and appetite ratings did not differ between conditions at meal completion. However, subjects rated less hunger and tended to rate lower desire-to-eat and greater satiety at 1 hour following the slow condition. Conclusions: Results tend to support a role of slow eating on decreased hunger and higher inter-meal satiety when water intake is controlled. However, the lack of significant differences in energy intake under these conditions indicates that water intake may account for the effects of eating rate on appetite regulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据