4.7 Article

In vitro analysis of flufenamic acid activity against Candida albicans biofilms

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2013.08.018

关键词

Candida albicans; Biofilm; Flufenamic acid; Antifungal

资金

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs (Merit Award)
  2. Biomedical Research Institute of New Mexico
  3. National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) through the Institutional Research and Career Development Award
  4. Academic Science Education and Research Training Program (IRACDA-ASERT) [K12GM088021]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In a recent high-throughput screen against specific Candida albicans drug targets, several compounds that exhibited non-specific antifungal activity were identified, including the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug flufenamic acid (FFA). This study sought to determine the effect of different doses of FFA, alone or in combination with fixed concentrations of the standard antifungal agents amphotericin B (AmB), caspofungin (CAS) or fluconazole (FLU), for the prevention and treatment of C. albicans biofilms. Biofilms were formed in a 96-well microplate followed by evaluation of antifungal activity using the XTT assay. FFA concentrations of >= 512 mg/L demonstrated >80% prevention of biofilm formation. FFA concentrations of 1024 mg/L demonstrated >85% reduction of mature biofilms. When FFA (>= 8 mg/L) was used in combination with FLU (32 mg/L), antifungal activity increased to 99% for the prevention of biofilm formation. Similarly, when a FFA concentration of >= 8 mg/L was used in combination with either AmB (0.25 mg/L) or CAS (0.125 mg/L), antifungal activity also increased up to 99% for the prevention of biofilm formation. The inhibitory effect of FFA on C. albicans biofilms has not been reported previously, therefore these findings suggest that FFA in combination with traditional antifungals might be useful for the treatment and prevention of C. albicans biofilms. Published by Elsevier B. V. on behalf of International Society of Chemotherapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据