3.9 Article

Effect of leptin on motility, capacitation and acrosome reaction of human spermatozoa

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY
卷 32, 期 6, 页码 687-694

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2008.00931.x

关键词

acrosome reaction; capacitation; leptin; leptin receptor; motility; spermatozoa

资金

  1. Seed Funding Programme for Basic Research
  2. University of Hong Kong
  3. Family Planning Association of Hong Kong

向作者/读者索取更多资源

P>Leptin is a polypeptide hormone with important roles in reproduction. It has been detected in human seminal plasma as well as on human ejaculated spermatozoa. This study aimed at studying the possible role of leptin in regulating human sperm functions. Immunofluorescent staining was used to study the expression of leptin and its receptor. The correlation between the concentration of leptin and soluble leptin receptor (ObRs) in seminal plasma as measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay and sperm motility parameters measured by computer-assisted sperm analyais (CASA) was determined. The effects of recombinant leptin on human sperm motility, capacitation and acrosome reaction as measured by chlortetracycline staing were also studied. Leptin immunoreactivity was demonstrated at the equatorial and neck regions of human spermatozoa, whereas that of ObRs was shown up on the tail. After Percoll separation, spermatozoa with high density had more intense leptin immunoreactivity compared with those with low density. No significant correlation was found between seminal plasma concentration of leptin/ObRs and sperm motility parameters. After incubation with recombinant human leptin for either 3 h or overnight, there was no change in all the CASA motility parameters determined and percentages of capacitated and acrosome-reacted spermatozoa. We concluded that leptin does not have a significant effect on motility and capacitation/acrosome reaction in human ejaculated mature spermatozoa. Its role in male reproduction is yet to be determined.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据