4.6 Article

Direct metal laser fabrication: machine development and experimental work

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-009-2174-9

关键词

DMLF; Metal powders; SLS; System integration; Microstructure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel modification of the freeform technique selective laser sintering machine via system integration to develop a direct metal laser fabrication machine suitable for both nonmetal and metal materials is put forward in this paper, the aim of which is to establish an experiment platform for studying the direct metal laser fabrication (DMLF) as a variant of selective laser sintering (SLS). The system integration of two machines is realized by use of the low-power SLS Machine (CO2, 50 W) and high-power laser processing machine (CO2, 2,000 W) in our institute after the improvement or rebuilding of light route system, functional units, machinery and electrical system, and control software in the primary SLS machine, which means that direct metal laser fabrication machine with the laser power up to 1,000 W has been developed successfully. Functional tests of two machines and DMLF experiments of a large number of metal powders including Cu-based mixture and 316L-based mixture of powder have been done in detail. The results show that the material suitable for direct metal laser fabrication machine ranges from nonmetal powders to metal powders, including polystyrene, polyamide, polycarbonate, sands, and a large number of metal powders. At the same time, the primary functions or performances of both low-power SLS Machine and high-power laser processing machine are preserved entirely. Metal samples based on copper and 316L powders can be fabricated with the relative density of about 80% and 100%, respectively, by use of developed DMLF machine. The macro appearance and microstructure and processing mechanisms of DMLF are analyzed minutely. The academic application of DMLF machine for metal powders with high melting point has been making its mark.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据