4.5 Article

Phylogeny and evolution of the Piroplasmida as inferred from 18S rRNA sequences

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR PARASITOLOGY
卷 42, 期 4, 页码 353-363

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2012.02.005

关键词

Babesia; Cytauxzoon; Theileria; Piroplasmida; 18S rDNA; Phylogenetics; Duncani Group; Microti Group

资金

  1. Department of Zoology
  2. Center for Veterinary Health Sciences at Oklahoma State University, USA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The order Piroplasmida consists of several genera of tick-borne parasites that infect mammals, and to a lesser extent birds, and are therefore of medical and economic importance. Despite their importance, considerable confusion exists concerning the relationship among piroplasmid species, specifically concerning the number of genera and the intergeneric relationships. To examine evolutionary relationships among piroplasmids, we conducted phylogenetic analyses of 192 18S rDNA sequences from the genera Theileria, Babesia and Cytauxzoon. Our analyses revealed eight clades potentially representing distinct genera, and we distinguish the Duncani Group and Microti Group as genetically distinct groups of species requiring detailed analysis of morphology and life-history to allow formal generic description. The piroplasmid phylogeny revealed considerable host diversity and limited host specificity, suggesting piroplasmids have undergone frequent host switches during their evolution. Our analyses provide the first reported evolutionary timescale for piroplasmids independent of the assumption of parasite-host cospeciation, which is invalid for piroplasmids. Evolutionary rate analyses revealed considerable substitution rate heterogeneity, which we attribute to host switching and diversification. Finally, we call for a comprehensive phylogenetic, morphological and life-history analysis for these medically relevant taxa to resolve relationships and understand host specificity. (C) 2012 Australian Society for Parasitology Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据