4.5 Article

Residual methylprednisolone suppresses human T-cell responses to spleen, but not islet, extracts from deceased organ donors

期刊

INTERNATIONAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 24, 期 7, 页码 447-453

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/intimm/dxs042

关键词

deceased organ donors; human spleen; methylprednisolone; mifepristone; T-cells

资金

  1. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [559007]
  2. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation (JDRF) [4-2006-1025]
  3. Diabetes Australia Research Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pancreatic islets, transplanted into recipients with type 1 diabetes, are exposed to allogenic and auto-immune T-cell responses. We set out to develop an assay to measure these responses using PBMC. Our approach was to prepare spleen extract from the islet donors (allo-antigen) and islet extracts (auto-antigen). To our surprise, we found that spleen extracts potently inhibited the proliferation of human T cells driven by antigen (tetanus toxoid) and mitogen (anti-CD3 mAb, OKT3), whereas extracts prepared from pancreatic islets from the same donor did not suppress T-cell proliferation. Suppression mediated by spleen extracts was unaffected by blocking mAbs against the IL-10R, transforming growth factor-beta or CD152 (CTLA-4). It was also unaffected by denaturing the spleen extracts by heating, exposing to reducing agents or protease digestion. Because deceased organ donors are commonly given the immunosuppressive glucocorticoid methylprednisolone prior to death, we hypothesized that suppression was due to residual methylprednisolone in the spleen extracts. Methylprednisolone could be detected by mass spectrometry in spleen extracts at concentrations that suppress T-cell proliferation. Finally, the glucocorticoid receptor antagonist mifepristone completely reversed the suppression caused by the spleen extracts. We conclude that extracts of human spleen, but not islets, from deceased organ donors contain sufficient residual methylprednisolone to suppress the proliferation of T-cells in vitro.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据