4.6 Article

Antioxidant, Fusarium growth inhibition and Nasutitermes corniger repellent activities of secondary metabolites from Myracrodruon urundeuva heartwood

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2009.01.002

关键词

Antioxidant; Fusarium; Myracrodruon urundeuva; Nasutitermes corniger; Secondary metabolites

资金

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Ciencia e Tecnologia do Estado de Pernambuco (FACEPE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Myracrodruon urundeuva heartwoodis resistant to biodeterioration and lectin purified from heartwood showed antifungal and termiticidal activities. This report deals with antioxidant, antifungal and termite repellent activities of secondary metabolites from M. urundeuva heartwood. Saline (SE, active hemagglutinin preparation) and methanolic (ME, without hemagglutinating activity) extracts contain phenolic compounds, gallic acid, flavonoids, luteolin, cinamic derivatives, proanthocyaniclins, hydrolysable tannins, and leucoanthocyanidins. Both SE and ME showed antioxidant activity and were effective in Fusarium growth inhibition. SE was efficient against Fusarium decemcellulare, Fusarium moniliforme, Fusarium oxysporum, and Fusarium solani but it had little effect against Fusarium lateritium. ME practically had no effect on E decemcellulare and was more active than SE against E lateritium. SE induced mortality of Nasutitermes corniger (LC50 of 1.81 mg ml(-1) for soldiers and 2.59 mg ml(-1) for workers) and had no repellent activity. ME had no termiticidal activity but was a good repellent. The detected bioactivities point out the possibility of participation of secondary metabolites in the resistance of M. urundeuva heartwood to biodeterioration. Additionally, the results indicate the use of wood residues, as extracts, a source of natural bioactive agents. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据