4.2 Article

The Absence of Large Ulcer Predicts Latent Cytomegalovirus Infection in Ulcerative Colitis with Positive Mucosal Viral Assay

期刊

INTERNAL MEDICINE
卷 49, 期 21, 页码 2277-2282

出版社

JAPAN SOC INTERNAL MEDICINE
DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.49.3657

关键词

ulcerative colitis; cytomegalovirus infection; mucosal PCR assay; antiviral therapy

资金

  1. Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, and Research on Measures for Intractable Disease

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective Although many studies have shown that cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is an exacerbating factor in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), there is no valid method to distinguish CMV infection requiring therapy from that disappearing without therapy. The aim of this study was to describe whether or not the endoscopic feature of a large ulcer predicts the necessity of antiviral therapy against CMV infection in active UC patients with positive mucosal viral assay. Methods Active UC patients in whom CMV infection was detected by mucosal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay were enrolled in this prospective observational clinical study. Patients with a large ulcer (ulcerated group) were treated with antiviral and UC therapy. Patients without a large ulcer (non-ulcerated group) were treated with only UC therapy. We prospectively evaluated the clinical and endoscopic findings in all of the patients 2 months after starting this protocol, and observed their outcomes during one year. Results In the ulcerated group (n=10), 3 patients still had active disease at 2 months and underwent colectomy. Although the other 7 patients achieved remission at 2 months, 4 of the 7 patients had a flare-up, and the remaining 3 patients maintained remission. All of the patients in the non-ulcerated group (n=10) attained remission without antiviral therapy at 2 months, and maintained remission. Conclusion In active UC patients with positive CMV DNA by mucosal PCR assay, the absence of a large ulcer suggests latent CMV infection, and requires no antiviral therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据