4.6 Article

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for acute domestic carbon monoxide poisoning: two randomized controlled trials

期刊

INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE
卷 37, 期 3, 页码 486-492

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-010-2093-0

关键词

Carbon monoxide poisoning; Oxygen; Hyperbaric oxygen therapy; Coma; Clinical trials

资金

  1. Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO) is broadly used for carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning, its efficacy and practical modalities remain controversial. To assess HBO in patients poisoned with CO. Two prospective randomized trial on two parallel groups. Critical Care Unit, Raymond Poincar, Hospital, Garches, France. Three hundred eighty-five patients with acute domestic CO poisoning. Patients with transient loss of consciousness (trial A, n = 179) were randomized to either 6 h of normobaric oxygen therapy (NBO; arm A0, n = 86) or 4 h of NBO plus one HBO session (arm A1, n = 93). Patients with initial coma (trial B, n = 206) were randomized to either 4 h of NBO plus one HBO session (arm B1, n = 101) or 4 h of NBO plus two 2 HBO sessions (arm B2, n = 105). Proportion of patients with complete recovery at 1 month. In trial A, there was no evidence for a difference in 1-month complete recovery rates with and without HBO [58% compared to 61%; unadjusted odds ratio, 0.90 (95% CI, 0.47-1.71)]. In trial B, complete recovery rates were significantly lower with two than with one HBO session [47% compared to 68%; unadjusted odds ratio, 0.42 (CI, 0.23-0.79)]. In patients with transient loss of consciousness, there was no evidence of superiority of HBO over NBO. In comatose patients, two HBO sessions were associated with worse outcomes than one HBO session.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据