4.6 Article

Extended drotrecogin alfa (activated) treatment in patients with prolonged septic shock

期刊

INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE
卷 35, 期 7, 页码 1187-1195

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-009-1436-1

关键词

Drotrecogin alfa (activated); Xigris; Sepsis; Shock; Vasopressor; Protein C

资金

  1. Eli Lilly and Company

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To determine the efficacy and safety of extended drotrecogin alfa (activated) (DAA) therapy. Multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Sixty-four intensive care units in nine countries. Adults with severe sepsis and vasopressor-dependent hypotension after a 96-h infusion of standard DAA. A total of 193 patients received an intravenous infusion of extended DAA 24 A mu g/kg/h or sodium chloride placebo for a maximum of 72 h. At extended therapy initiation (baseline), DAA-group patients had lower protein C levels (P = 0.23) and higher vasopressor requirements, particularly for the primary vasopressor used, norepinephrine (P = 0.03), compared with placebo-group patients. DAA treatment did not result in a difference in the primary outcome of time to resolution of vasopressor-dependent hypotension versus placebo (P = 0.419). However, few patients reached resolution (DAA 34%, placebo 40%) as most continued to require vasopressor support after 72 additional hours of treatment. Treatment did not reduce 28-day all-cause mortality and in-hospital mortality or improve organ function compared with placebo, although there was a lower percentage change in D-dimers (P < 0.001) and increases in protein C levels were numerically greater on extended infusion. There was no difference in serious adverse events including bleeding events. Extended DAA treatment did not result in more rapid resolution of vasopressor-dependent hypotension, despite demonstrating anticipated biological effects on D-dimer and protein C levels. A reduced planned sample size combined with baseline imbalances in protein C levels and vasopressor requirements may have limited the ability to demonstrate a clinical benefit.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据