4.1 Article

Physiological consequences of prolonged nursing in the honey bee

期刊

INSECTES SOCIAUX
卷 56, 期 1, 页码 85-93

出版社

SPRINGER BASEL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s00040-008-1042-1

关键词

invertase; vitellogenin; ELISA; age polyethism

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [Lo 697/4- 4]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Honey bee workers normally produce brood food at an age of 5 to 15 days. However, natural events like swarming or brood diseases may lead to the occurrence of over-aged nurses. Here we investigated the physiological consequences of prolonged nursing for both the nurses and the brood they rear, and tried to separate the effects of chronological age and of task affiliation on some important physiological parameters. Brood was reared in groups of colonies with either a normal age structure or with moderately over-aged workers.The haemolymph concentrations of total protein and vitellogenin, the development of mandibular and hypopharyngeal glands, and the activity of alpha-glucosidase in the hypopharyngeal glands of nurses from these groups of colonies were compared. Moreover, we used the fertility of young workers reared by normal- and overaged nurses as a bioindicator for the quality of the brood care they had received. It showed that parameters linked to the production of brood food proteins remained stable in over-aged nurses, whereas the development of mandibular glands regressed. Workers reared by over-aged nurses had more ovarioles and showed stronger ovary development under queenless conditions. Our results indicate that while over-aged nurses remain capable of producing brood food, they are not functionally equivalent to young nurses. The partial degeneration of the mandibular glands normally occurring at the end of the nursing period cannot be prevented by prolonged nursing. The distinct phenotype of workers reared by old nurses raises the question of possible age-related specialisations among nurses in colonies with a normal age structure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据