4.4 Article

Effect of deadwood position on saproxylic beetles in temperate forests and conservation interest of oak snags

期刊

INSECT CONSERVATION AND DIVERSITY
卷 5, 期 4, 页码 264-278

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-4598.2011.00160.x

关键词

Biodiversity; forest management; legacy retention; standing deadwood

资金

  1. French GIP Ecofor (Ministry of Ecology) [CV050000150]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

. 1. Intensive forestry has drastically reduced the volume of standing deadwood, even more than total deadwood volume. It has been demonstrated in boreal forests that snags have a high conservation value for many saproxylic species and that the lying or standing aspect of the deadwood makes a difference. The conservation of saproxylic beetles in the changing deadwood landscape of temperate managed forests depends on a deeper understanding of the ecological value of forest stand legacies. 2. Our study questioned whether the retention of oak snags is an important conservation concern in European temperate forests. We analysed the differences in saproxylic beetle fauna between oak snags and logs and explored the diameter effect on logsnag differences. We compared the species composition and richness of saproxylic beetle assemblages in a temperate deciduous forest. Emergence traps were set in a balanced sampling design of 22 ground-lying logs and 22 oak snags with a range of intermediate decay stages and 2 diameter classes. 3. Oak snags yielded more individuals per volume unit and supported more species than logs, and exhibited significantly dissimilar assemblages from logs and hosted original species. Snags, especially large snags, were more interesting for rare beetle species conservation than logs. The feeding guild structure slightly differed between snags and logs. Overall, logsnag differences depended on the diameter class. 4. We confirm that saproxylic biodiversity would significantly benefit from forestry measures favouring oak snag retention (especially large snags), even though further multi-scale studies are necessary to develop quantitative retention guidelines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据