4.7 Article

Highly Active Dinuclear Titanium(IV) Complexes for the Catalytic Formation of a Carbon-Heteroatom Bond

期刊

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 57, 期 20, 页码 12610-12623

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b01766

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japan International Cooperation Agency FRIENDSHIP Project under the Collaboration Kickstarter Programme [ARC2016-2]
  2. CSIR
  3. UGC India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of mononuclear titanium(IV) complexes with the general composition kappa(3)-[R{NHPh2P(X)}(2)Ti(NMe2)(2)] [R = C6H4, X = Se (3b); R = trans-C6H10, X = S (4a), Se (4b)] and [{kappa(2)-N(PPh2Se)(2)}(2)Ti(NMe2)(2)] (6b) and two dinuclear titanium(IV) complexes, [C6H4{(NPh2PS)(N)}Ti(NMe2)](2) (3c) and [{kappa(2)-N(PPh2Se)}Ti(NMe2)(2)](2) (6c), are reported. Dinuclear titanium(IV) complex 6c acts as an efficient catalyst for the chemoselective addition of an E-H bond (E = N, O, S, P, C) to heterocumulenes under mild conditions. The catalytic addition of aliphatic and aromatic amines, alcohol, thiol, phosphine oxide, and acetylene to the carbodiimides afforded the corresponding hydroelemented products in high yield at mild conditions with a broader substrate scope. The catalytic efficiency of the dinuclear complex depends on the cooperative effect of the Ti-IV ions, the systematic variation of the intermetallic distance, and the ligand's steric properties of the complex, which enhances the reaction rate. Most interestingly, this is the first example of catalytic insertion of various E-H bonds into the carbodiimides using a single-site catalyst because only the titanium-mediated insertion of E-H into a C=N unsaturated bond is reported to date. The amine and alcohol insertion reaction with the carbodiimides showed first-order kinetics with respect to the titanium(IV) catalyst as well as substrates. A most plausible mechanism for hydroelementation reaction is also proposed, based on the spectroscopic data of the controlled reaction, a time-course study, and the Hammett plot.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据