4.7 Article

Homogeneous Hydrogenation and Isomerization of 1-Octene Catalyzed by Nickel(II) Complexes with Bidentate Diarylphosphane Ligands

期刊

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 52, 期 14, 页码 8190-8201

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ic400973t

关键词

-

资金

  1. Council for Chemical Sciences of The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research
  2. NIOK Research Graduate School of Leiden University
  3. Dutch Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A systematic library of 24 nickel(II) complexes with bidentate diphosphane ligands was synthesized, and the solid-state structures of five of them were determined with X-ray crystallography. The compounds C1-C3 are common (P2NiX2)-X-II-type complexes, while C4 contains a unique [P2NiII(NH3)(OAc)](+) square-planar structure with a P2NO donor set and C5 constitutes a rare [(P2NiII)(2)(mu-OH)(2)](2+) dinuclear compound. The catalytic activity of all complexes was tested in the hydrogenation and/or isomerization of 1-octene in a CH2Cl2/CH3OH reaction medium. Catalyst precursors bearing ligands with o-alkoxy aryl rings selectively hydrogentate 1-octene to n-octane, while catalytic systems comprising ligands without the o-alkoxy functionality selectively isomerize the substrate to a mixture of internal alkenes, mostly cis- and trans-2-octene. The conversion is enhanced by equipping the ligand aryl rings with electron-donating alkoxy groups, by increasing the steric bulk of the backbone and/or the aryl rings, by employing relatively noncoordinating anions, and by adding a base as the cocatalyst. Using the compound [Ni(L3X)I-2] as the catalyst precursor and upon application of standard hydrogenation conditions, full conversion of the substrate was achieved in 1 h to isomerization products only (TON = 1940). When a catalytic amount of the base is added, a similar result is obtained even in the absence of H-2. A maximum TON of 4500 in 1 h with 96% selectivity for n-octane was achieved by employing [Ni(oMeO-L3X)(NH3)(OAc))]PF6 as the catalyst precursor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据