4.7 Article

Symmetrical P4 Cleavage at Cobalt: Characterization of Intermediates on the Way from P4 to Coordinated P2 Units

期刊

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 51, 期 6, 页码 3904-3909

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ic300219w

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of Karlsruhe (TH)
  2. Julius-Maximilians-Universitat Wurzburg
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
  4. state of Bavaria

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Degradation of white phosphorus (P-4) in the coordination sphere of transition metals is commonly divided into two major pathways depending on the P-x ligands obtained. Consecutive metal-assisted P-P bond cleavage of four bonds of the P-4 tetrahedron leads to complexes featuring two P-2 ligands (symmetric cleavage) or one P-3 and one P, ligand (asymmetric cleavage). A systematic investigation of the degradation of white phosphorus P-4 to coordinated mu,eta(2:2)-bridging diphosphorus ligands in the coordination sphere of cobalt is presented. herein as well as isolation of each of the decisive intermediates on the reaction pathway. The olefin complex [Cp*Co((i)Pr(2)Im)(eta(2)-C2H4)], 1 (Cp* = eta(5)-C5Me5, (i)Pr(2)Im = 1,3-di-isopropylimidazolin-2-ylidene), reacts with P-4 to give [Cp*Co((i)Pr(2)Im)(eta(2)-P-4)], 2, the insertion product of [Cp*Co((i)Pr(2)Im)] into one of the P-P bonds. Addition of a further equivalent of the Co-I complex [Cp*Co((i)Pr(2)Im)(eta(2)-C2H4)], 1, induces cleavage of a second P-P bond to yield the dinudear complex [{Cp*Co((i)Pr(2)Im)}(2)(mu,eta(2:2)-P-4)], 3, in which a kinked cyclo-P-4(4-) ligand bridges two cobalt atoms. Consecutive dissociation of the N-heterocyclic carbene with concomitant rearrangement of the cyclo-P-4 ligand and P-P dissociation leads to complexes [Cp*Co(mu,eta(4:2)-P-4)Co((i)Pr(2)Im)Cp*], 4, featuring a P-4 chain, and [{Cp*Co(mu,eta(2:2)-P-2)}(2)], 5, in which two isolated P-2(2-) ligands bridge two [Cp*Co] fragments. Each of these reactions is quantitative if performed on an NMR scale, and each compound can be isolated in high yields and large quantities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据