4.7 Article

Decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency analysis

期刊

INFORMATION SCIENCES
卷 467, 期 -, 页码 115-134

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2018.07.036

关键词

Decision procedure; IVIFPR; Additive consistency; Consensus; Programming model

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71571192, 71671188]
  2. Innovation-Driven Project of Central South University [2018CX039]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University [2018zzts094]
  4. Major Project for National Natural Science Foundation of China [71790615]
  5. State Key Program of National Natural Science of China [71431006]
  6. Hunan Province Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of China [2016JJ1024]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper discusses the theory and application of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations (IVIFPRs). To do this, we first introduce an additive consistency concept for IVIFPRs that can address the issues in previous ones. Then, several additive consistency based programming models for judging the consistency of IVIFPRs and for determining missing values are constructed. Furthermore, an approach for calculating the interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy priority weight vector is offered. With respect to group decision making with IVIFPRs, a consensus index is offered, and an interactive algorithm for improving the consensus level is proposed that can ensure the additive consistency. After that, a consensus analysis-based programming model for determining the weights of decision makers is built. Furthermore, a consistency-and-consensus-based group decision making method that can address inconsistent and incomplete IVIFPRs is developed. Finally, a practical decision-making problem about evaluating talents in universities is offered to show the feasibility and efficiency of the new method. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据