4.5 Article

Cesarean section and the risk of pediatric Crohn's disease

期刊

INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES
卷 18, 期 4, 页码 703-708

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1002/ibd.21741

关键词

Crohn's disease; cesarean section; sex difference; case-control study

资金

  1. Broad Foundation
  2. Stiftelsen Samariten

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Crohn's disease (CD) could involve an inappropriate immune response against normal bowel flora. Disrupted or atypical patterns of microbial bowel colonization may impair development of homeostasis between gut flora and the immune system. Perinatal microbial exposures may be particularly important in stimulating intestinal immune recognition. As birth by cesarean section is thought to represent an atypical pattern of early bowel colonization, we examined its association with pediatric CD. Methods: Some 1536 patients diagnosed with pediatric CD and 15,439 controls matched by delivery unit, week of birth, sex, and born between 1973 and 2006 were identified through Swedish registers. The association of birth by cesarean section with pediatric CD was examined using conditional logistic regression, with stratification by sex and adjustment for parental socioeconomic index and maternal infections during pregnancy. Results: Birth by cesarean section is associated with a modestly increased risk for pediatric CD among boys (odds ratio [OR] 1.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.54) but not girls, (OR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.76-1.29) and elective cesarean section is associated with a modest increased risk for the entire population (OR = 1.36, 95% CI 1.02-1.80). Conclusions: This study does not suggest that the delivery procedure should be altered, but the findings may be of etiological significance in CD, indicating a potential role for perinatal exposures associated with delivery mode. Although the sex difference may have arisen by chance, the modestly increased CD risk for boys delivered by cesarean section is consistent with sex-specific differences in susceptibility to some exposures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据