4.5 Article

Association Between Early-life Factors and Risk of Child-onset Crohn's Disease Among Victorian Children Born 1983-1998: A Birth Cohort Study

期刊

INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES
卷 15, 期 6, 页码 858-866

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1002/ibd.20842

关键词

Crohn's disease; perinatal; risk factor; incidence; temporal increase

资金

  1. Murdoch Childrens Research Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The incidence of Crohn's disease (CD) with onset before age 16 has increased. Several perinatal characteristics have been associated with CD. Our objective was to examine the temporal change in CD incidence by period of birth and the extent that this Could be attributed to perinatal characteristics associated with higher CD risk. Methods: A record linkage study was conducted utilizing the perinatal records of Victorian births 1983-1998 inclusive and a state-based CD registry. Proportional hazards models were used to investigate the perinatal factors in relation to the onset of CD C by age 16. Further, a nested case control Study was conducted to examine the association between sibling exposure and CD risk. Results: The CD incidence rate for births 1983-1998 was 2.01 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.79, 2.27) per 100,000 childyears. A birth cohort effect was demonstrated, with higher CD risk for 1992-1998 versus 1983-1991 births (hazard ratio [HR] 1.56; 95% CI 1.18, 2.06). Perinatal characteristics associated with higher CD risk included urban location, higher socioeconomic status, married mother, a congenital abnormality and delivery by elective cesarean section. Sibling exposure during the first 6 years of life was not associated with CD risk. The increased CD incidence among more recent births was not accounted for by changes in these measured perinatal factors. Conclusions: The temporal increase in CD incidence documented for births tip to 1990 has continued for children born after 1991 and was not accounted for by temporal changes in the measured perinatal factors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据