4.5 Article

Defect in CEACAM Family Member Expression in Crohn's Disease IECs Is Regulated by the Transcription Factor SOX9

期刊

INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES
卷 15, 期 12, 页码 1775-1783

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1002/ibd.21023

关键词

CEACAM; epithelial cells; Crohn's disease

资金

  1. Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America
  2. New York Crohn's Foundation
  3. NIH [AI23504, DK58288, AI44236, 1 S10 RR0 9145-01]
  4. NIH-NCI [5824 CA095823-04]
  5. NSF [DBI-9724504]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: CEACAM1, CEACAM5, and CEACAM6 represent 3 of the CEACAM (carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule) subfamily members expressed on intestinal epithelial cells (IECs). Deficiency in their expression, as seen in inflammatory bowel disease (1131)), results in the lack of activation of CD8+ regulatory T cells in the mucosa. Since CEACAM expression was shown to be regulated by the transcription factor SOX9, we sought to determine whether the defect in CEACAM expression in IBD was related to aberrant SOX9 expression. Methods: IECs and lamina propria lymphocytes (LPLs) were freshly isolated from colonic tissues. T84 and HT29 16E cells were cocultured with LPLs. SOX9 and CEACAM subfamily member expression was assessed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), Western blot, immunohistochemistry, and immunofluorescence. Results: In Crohn's disease (CD) but not in ulcerative colitis (UC), a significant reduction in mRNA and protein expression for CEACAM1 and 5 was noted; in contrast, no difference in SOX9 mRNA expression was seen. However, nuclear SOX9 immunostaining was increased in CD IECs. Furthermore, SOX9 protein was reduced in the cytoplasm of LPL-stimulated T84 and HT29 16E cells, while CEACAM5 expression was increased. Conclusions: The defect in CEACAM family members in CD IECs appears to be related to the aberrant nuclear localization of SOX9. Changes in SOX9 expression in the CD mucosa relate to the local microenvironment and altered IEC:LPL crosstalk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据