4.5 Article

Disease perceptions among people with Crohn's disease

期刊

INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES
卷 14, 期 8, 页码 1097-1101

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/ibd.20418

关键词

Crohn's disease; patient perceptions; therapy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The relationship between Crohn's disease (CD) patients' perceptions of overall disease course to severity measures based on current symptomatology has not been fully explored. We sought to characterize CD patient perceptions of both overall disease course and current symptomatology based on an objective symptom scale and to explore the relationship between perceptions and current symptoms. Methods: Patients were screened by telephone and those who met inclusion criteria were invited to complete a full, self-administered online survey. Results: Respondents (n = 1205) were predominantly female (66%) and Caucasian (92%); the median age was 44 years. Self-perceived overall disease course was described as mild in 16%, moderate in 50%, and severe in 34%; these correlated poorly with objective measures of current symptomatology. Perceived current symptomatology was mild in 61%, moderate in 29%, and severe in 10%. Patients perceived their overall disease course as snore severe than that reflected by current symptomatology. Among 61% who had mild disease based on 3D-day symptoms, only 16% rated themselves as having a mild disease cotH-se overall. Similar results among those in the moderate and severe overall disease categories indicated poor congruence between perceived overall disease course and measures of current disease symptomatology. Conclusions: Perceptions of overall disease severity may not correlate with disease activity measures based oil current symptomatology. Patients rely on physicians to guide treatment choices; thus, a more complete appreciation of patients' disease perceptions that includes both overall disease course and current symptomatology may help inform treatment decisions, and could potentially improve patient care.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据