4.4 Article

Morphogenesis Is Not Required for Candida albicans-Staphylococcus aureus Intra-Abdominal Infection-Mediated Dissemination and Lethal Sepsis

期刊

INFECTION AND IMMUNITY
卷 82, 期 8, 页码 3426-3435

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.01746-14

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease [R01-A172406]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intra-abdominal polymicrobial infections cause significant morbidity and mortality. An established experimental mouse model of Staphylococcus aureus-Candida albicans intra-abdominal infection results in similar to 60% mortality within 48 h postinoculation, concomitant with amplified local inflammatory responses, while monomicrobial infections are avirulent. The purpose of this study was to characterize early local and systemic innate responses during coinfection and determine the role of C. albicans morphogenesis in lethality, a trait involved in virulence and physical interaction with S. aureus. Local and systemic proinflammatory cytokines were significantly elevated during coinfection at early time points (4 to 12 h) compared to those in monoinfection. In contrast, microbial burdens in the organs and peritoneal lavage fluid were similar between mono-and coinfected animals through 24 h, as was peritoneal neutrophil infiltration. After optimizing the model for 100% mortality within 48 h, using 3.5 x 10(7) C. albicans (5x increase), coinfection with C. albicans yeast-locked or hypha-locked mutants showed similar mortality, dissemination, and local and systemic inflammation to the isogenic control. However, coinfection with the yeast-locked C. albicans mutant given intravenously (i.v.) and S. aureus given intraperitoneally (i.p.) failed to induce mortality. These results suggest a unique intra-abdominal interaction between the host and C. albicans-S. aureus that results in strong inflammatory responses, dissemination, and lethal sepsis, independent of C. albicans morphogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据