4.4 Article

A Double Mutant Heat-Labile Toxin from Escherichia coli, LT(R192G/L211A), Is an Effective Mucosal Adjuvant for Vaccination against Helicobacter pylori Infection

期刊

INFECTION AND IMMUNITY
卷 81, 期 5, 页码 1532-1540

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.01407-12

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council (Medicine)
  2. Marianne and Marcus Wallenberg foundation
  3. Ake Wiberg foundation
  4. Adlerbert foundation
  5. Magnus Bergvall foundation
  6. Nanna Svartz foundation
  7. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Helicobacter pylori infection in the stomach is a common cause of peptic ulcer disease and is a strong risk factor for the development of gastric adenocarcinoma, yet no effective vaccine against H. pylori infection is available to date. In mice, mucosal vaccination with H. pylori antigens when given together with cholera toxin (CT) adjuvant, but not without adjuvant, can induce protective immune responses against H. pylori infection. However, the toxicity of CT precludes its use as a mucosal adjuvant in humans. We evaluated a recently developed, essentially nontoxic double mutant Escherichia coli heat-labile toxin, LT(R192G/L211A) (dmLT), as a mucosal adjuvant in an experimental H. pylori vaccine and compared it to CT in promoting immune responses and protection against H. pylori infection in mice. Immunization via the sublingual or intragastric route with H. pylori lysate antigens and dmLT resulted in a significant decrease in bacterial load after challenge compared to that in unimmunized infection controls and to the same extent as when using CT as an adjuvant. Cellular immune responses in the sublingually immunized mice known to correlate with protection were also fully comparable when using dmLT and CT as adjuvants, resulting in enhanced in vitro proliferative and cytokine responses from spleen and mesenteric lymph node cells to H. pylori antigens. Our results suggest that dmLT is an attractive adjuvant for inclusion in a mucosal vaccine against H. pylori infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据