4.4 Article

Primary Human Colonic Myofibroblasts Are Resistant to Clostridium difficile Toxin A-Induced, but Not Toxin B-Induced, Cell Death

期刊

INFECTION AND IMMUNITY
卷 79, 期 4, 页码 1623-1630

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00686-10

关键词

-

资金

  1. Medical Research Council
  2. Medical Research Council [G0100577, G0500067] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. MRC [G0100577, G0500067] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Colonic inflammation in Clostridium difficile infection is mediated by released toxins A and B. We investigated responses to C. difficile toxins A and B by isolated primary human colonic myofibroblasts, which represent a distinct subpopulation of mucosal cells that are normally located below the intestinal epithelium. Following incubation with either purified toxin A or B, there was a change in myofibroblast morphology to stellate cells with processes that were immunoreactive for alpha-smooth muscle actin. Most of the myofibroblasts remained viable, with persistence of stellate morphology, despite exposure to high concentrations (up to 10 mu g/ml) of toxin A for 72 h. In contrast, a majority of the toxin B-exposed myofibroblasts lost their processes prior to cell death over 24 to 72 h. At low concentrations, toxin A provided protection against toxin B-induced cell death. Within 4 h, myofibroblasts exposed to either toxin A or toxin B lost expression of the nonglucosylated form of Rac1, and there was also a loss of the active form of RhoA. Despite preexposure to high concentrations of toxin A for 3 h, colonic myofibroblasts were able to recover their morphology and proliferative capacity during prolonged culture in medium. However, toxin B-preexposed myofibroblasts were not able to recover. In conclusion, primary human colonic mucosal myofibroblasts are resistant to toxin A (but not toxin B)-induced cell death. Responses by colonic myofibroblasts may play an important role in mucosal protection, repair, and regeneration in colitis due to C. difficile infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据