4.4 Article

Loss of Ability To Self-Heal Malaria upon Taurine Transporter Deletion

期刊

INFECTION AND IMMUNITY
卷 78, 期 4, 页码 1642-1649

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.01159-09

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [GRK 1427, SFB 575]
  2. Centre of Excellence for Biodiversity Research, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Deletion of the taurine transporter gene (taut) results in lowered levels of taurine, the most abundant amino acid in mammals. Here, we show that taut(-/-) mice have lost their ability to self-heal blood-stage infections with Plasmodium chabaudi malaria. All taut(-/-) mice succumb to infections during crisis, while about 90% of the control taut(+/+) mice survive. The latter retain unchanged taurine levels even at peak parasitemia. Deletion of taut, however, results in the lowering of circulating taurine levels from 540 to 264 mu mol/liter, and infections cause additional lowering to 192 mu mol/liter. Peak parasitemia levels in taut(-/-) mice are approximately 60% higher than those in taut(+/+) mice, an elevation that is associated with increased systemic tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) and interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta) levels, as well as with liver injuries. The latter manifest as increased systemic ammonia levels, a perturbed capacity to entrap injected particles, and increased expression of genes encoding TNF-alpha, IL-1 beta, IL-6, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), NF-kappa B, and vitamin D receptor (VDR). Autopsy reveals multiorgan failure as the cause of death for malaria-infected taut(-/-) mice. Our data indicate that taut-controlled taurine homeostasis is essential for resistance to P. chabaudi malaria. Taurine deficiency due to taut deletion, however, impairs the eryptosis of P. chabaudi-parasitized erythrocytes and expedites increases in systemic TNF-alpha, IL-1 beta, and ammonia levels, presumably contributing to multiorgan failure in P. chabaudi-infected taut(-/-) mice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据