4.4 Article

Discriminating Virulence Mechanisms among Bacillus anthracis Strains by Using a Murine Subcutaneous Infection Model

期刊

INFECTION AND IMMUNITY
卷 77, 期 1, 页码 429-435

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00647-08

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [P01 A1056295-01, U54 AI057156]
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [R01AI033537, U54AI057156] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bacillus anthracis strains harboring virulence plasmid pXO1 that encodes the toxin protein protective antigen (PA), lethal factor, and edema factor and virulence plasmid pXO2 that encodes capsule biosynthetic enzymes exhibit different levels of virulence in certain animal models. In the murine model of pulmonary infection, B. anthracis virulence was capsule dependent but toxin independent. We examined the role of toxins in subcutaneous (s.c.) infections using two different genetically complete (pXO1(+) pXO2(+)) strains of B. anthracis, strains Ames and UT500. Similar to findings for the pulmonary model, toxin was not required for infection by the Ames strain, because the 50% lethal dose (LD50) of a PA-deficient (PA(-)) Ames mutant was identical to that of the parent Ames strain. However, PA was required for efficient s.c. infection by the UT500 strain, because the s.c. LD50 of a UT500 PA(-) mutant was 10,000-fold higher than the LD50 of the parent UT500 strain. This difference between the Ames strain and the UT500 strain could not be attributed to differences in spore coat properties or the rate of germination, because s.c. inoculation with the capsulated bacillus forms also required toxin synthesis by the UT500 strain to cause lethal infection. The toxin-dependent phenotype of the UT500 strain was host phagocyte dependent, because eliminating Gr-1(+) phagocytes restored virulence to the UT500 PA(-) mutant. These experiments demonstrate that the dominant virulence factors used to establish infection by B. anthracis depend on the route of inoculation and the bacterial strain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据