4.6 Article

High Degradation Activity and Quantity Production of Aluminum-Doped Zinc Oxide Nanocrystals Modified by Nitrogen Atoms

期刊

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
卷 53, 期 6, 页码 2229-2237

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ie4041302

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21341007]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [222201313005]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse Foundation [13019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The precursor of aluminum-doped zinc oxide nanocrystals modified by nitrogen atoms (N-AZO) can be quantity-produced by ultrasonic hydrothermal equipment. Then the N-AZO photocatalysts with good visible-light response were synthesized via solid-phase method with urea as a nitrogen source. The ultraviolet visible (UV-vis) patterns of N-AZO nanocrystals obviously showed a red shift toward the visible-light region compared to pure aluminum-doped zinc oxide (AZO) nanocrystals and an absorbance in the wavelength range of 450-600 nm which was attributed to the change of lattice structure after nitrogen doping. The photocatalytic activity of N-AZO photocatalysts were investigated by the degradation of RhB solution in sunlight irradiation. The ratio of nitrogen atoms to Zn atoms had significant impact on the photocatalytic efficiency of N-AZO nanocrystals. The experimental results showed that the optimal doping mole ratio of urea molecules to zinc atoms was 6:5, and the RhB dyes were degradated completely within 2 h, exhibiting that improved photocatalytic activity increased by 400% compared with that of pure AZO nanocrystals. What is more, a feasible water purification reactor with continuous photodegradation was manufactured which was also suitable to degrade other kinds of organic pollutants by changing the effective photocatalyst. The result showed that when the flow velocity of RhB solution (2 x 10(-5) g/L) was 60 mL/min, the degradation rates of the four reactors were about 38%, 48%, 62.5%, and 100%, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据