4.6 Article

Dopamine-Modified Alginate Beads Reinforced by Cross-Linking via Titanium Coordination or Self-Polymerization and Its Application in Enzyme Immobilization

期刊

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
卷 52, 期 42, 页码 14828-14836

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ie401239e

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [21125627]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2009CB724705]
  3. National Science Foundation of China [21076145]
  4. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-10-0623]
  5. Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities [B06006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two novel kinds of dopamine-modified alginate beads were developed by using titanium(IV) coordination or self-polymerization, besides the conventional Ca2+ ion cross-linking. Alginate was modified with dopamine (Alg(DA)) via EDC/NHS chemistry. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and circular dichroism (CD) characterization confirmed that dopamine was covalently attached preferentially to the mannuronic acid residues of alginate; thus, gel-forming ability of the as-prepared Alg(DA) was well retained. The titanium(IV) coordination-reinforced alginate beads [Ca-Ti(Alg(DA))] were prepared by cross-linking with Ti4+ and Ca2+. Covalently cross-linking-reinforced alginate beads (Ca-Alg(PDA)) were also prepared by self-polymerization of dopamine and cross-linking with Ca2+. The swelling of Ca-Alg(PDA) and Ca-Ti(Alg(DA)) were both obviously inhibited, and the mechanical properties were enhanced by 3 times compared to those of Ca-Alg beads. The as-prepared beads were utilized for immobilization of alcohol dehydrogenase (YADH). The immobilization efficiency of Ca-Ti(Alg(DA)) and Ca-Alg(PDA) reached up to 100% and 89%, respectively, both notably higher than that of Ca-Alg (67.4%). Stabilities of the immobilized YADH in Ca-Alg(PDA) and Ca-Ti(Alg(DA)) toward pH, storage, and recycling were all improved compared with those immobilized in Ca-Alg.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据