4.6 Article

Process Simulation Based on Experimental Investigations for 3-Methylthiophene Alkylation with Isobutylene in a Reactive Distillation Column

期刊

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
卷 51, 期 29, 页码 9803-9811

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ie300034x

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2009CB219906]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20976144]
  3. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20110201130002]
  4. Overall Scientific and Technological Innovation Program of Shaanxi Province of China [2012KTCL01-09]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new approach that substitutes the original two-step olefinic alkylation of thiophenic sulfur (OATS) technology with a reactive distillation (RD) column was proposed to remove sulfur compounds from fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) gasoline. 3-Methylthiophene (3MT) and isobutylene (IB) were designated as the model compounds for sulfide and olefin, respectively; NKC-9 cation exchange resin mixed with the 2 mm X 2 mm theta ring packing was used as the catalyst bed. The process parameters such as feed composition, molar ratio of 3MT to IB, and reflux ratio were investigated experimentally in the RD column. Simulation for this process was carried out by using the equilibrium stage model-the RADFRAC module of Aspen Plus. The multicomponent vapor-liquid equilibria were predicted by an UNIQUAC method, and the kinetics model that is essential in the RD process was obtained from our previous work. The key design factors (e.g., number of reactive and nonreactive stages, location of feed stage, column pressure, mass ratio of distillate to feed, and catalyst weight) were optimized. The theoretical calculations from the equilibrium stage model matched well with the experimental results. Optimization of the process revealed that applying RD technology into OATS process offers higher alkylation selectivity and better catalytic stability, and the sulfur content in FCC gasoline declined by more than 99%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据