4.6 Article

Chemocatalytic Oxidation of Lactose to Lactobionic Acid over Pd-Bi/SBA-15: Reaction Kinetics and Modeling

期刊

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
卷 49, 期 15, 页码 6878-6889

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ie901724j

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. Dairy Farmers of Canada
  3. Canadian Foundation for Innovation (CFI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lactobionic acid (LBA) was synthesized from the direct aerobic oxidation of lactose under a very low O-2 concentration with high conversion (96%) and 100% selectivity over low loadings (1.02-0.64%) of bimetallic Pd-Bi supported on mesoporous SBA-15 silica material. Under alkaline conditions (pH 9), the catalyst exhibited enhanced activity and stability with unprecedented complete selectivity toward LBA formation. Furthermore, it exhibited pretty good stability toward metal leaching. It was observed that, with a selective deposition of bismuth on palladium, as well as adequate alkaline pH processing, the redox reaction chain performed efficiently and maintained the continuous dehydrogenation of lactose, while avoiding poisoning of the Pd-Bi bimetallic catalyst. Using the Langmuir-Hinshelwood-Hougen-Watson approach, a kinetic model was developed to predict the fates of the lactose and LBA. The rate equation of lactose consumption contains Langmuir adsorption terms, which accounts for the competitive reversible dissociative chemisorption of oxygen and for the reversible associative adsorption of lactose. The kinetic model was verified by comparing the experimental results with those foreseen in the simulation for different experimental conditions. The assessment of the determined Arrhenius parameters led to physically meaningful estimates of activation energy. The Langmuir adsorption isotherms are physically meaningful, where the standard entropy and enthalpy of adsorption were shown to fulfill established guidelines, which assesses the physical sense of their values.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据