3.8 Article

Protection of Penaeus monodon from Infection of White spot syndrome virus by DNA Construct Expressing Long Hairpin-RNA Against ICP11 Gene

期刊

INDIAN JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
卷 21, 期 2, 页码 95-102

出版社

SPRINGER INDIA
DOI: 10.1007/s13337-011-0024-5

关键词

ICP11; WSSV; Peneaus monodon; Long hairpin RNA; Combinatorial RNAi

类别

资金

  1. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A plasmid construct (pICP11-LH) was designed to constitutively express long-hairpin RNA (1hRNA) against icp11 gene, which is reportedly the most highly expressed gene of White spot syndrome virus (WSSV) and likely to have an important role in viral pathogenesis. The construct was used singly and in combination with other similar constructs designed against vp28 and vp19. A total of 6 treatments, T1 (pICP11-LH; 35 mu g), T2 (pVP28-LH; 35 mu g), T3 (pVP28-LH and pVP19-LH; 17.5 mu g each), T4 (pVP28-LH and pVP19-LH; 25 mu g:10 mu g), T5 (pICP11-LH, pVP28-LH and pVP19-LH; 11.5 mu g each) and T6 (pGFP-LH; 35 mu g) were injected intramuscularly into 20 g Penaeus monodon specimens. The shrimp were challenged with WSSV 24 hpi and protection efficacy was measured in terms of survival and viral load 15 days after challenge. Appropriate negative and positive controls were used. T2 and T3 offered highest protection (75%) followed by T1 (67%) and T4 and T5 groups (58%), while T6 showed 25% protection. In all the target specific treatments, the viral load as estimated by single tube WSSV kit was kept in check (10-100 copies), whereas in the unimmunized challenged controls it progressed to severe infection (>10(5) copies). In spite of over 3 times higher expression of ICP11 compared to VP28, its knockdown by pICP11-LH did not offer any protective advantage over pVP28-LH, either singly or in combination. Moreover, none of the combinations bettered the protection efficacy of pVP28-LH administered alone. To investigate concerns about deleterious effect of plasmid persistence and constitutive expression on shrimp growth, a lab-scale 1 month growth study was conducted with 4 treatments T2, T3, T4 and T6, where no difference in specific growth rate was observed compared to controls.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据