4.3 Article

Galectin-3 expression in response to LPS, immunomodulatory drugs and exogenously added galectin-3 in monocyte-like THP-1 cells

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11626-012-9540-x

关键词

Cytokines; Galectin-3; Immunomodulatory drugs; LPS; Monocyte-like THP-1 cells

资金

  1. Ministry of Science, Education and Sports of the Republic of Croatia [006-006-1194-1218]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Galectin-3, a structurally unique beta-galactoside-binding lectin, through the specific protein-protein and protein-carbohydrate interactions participates in numerous biological processes, such as cell proliferation and apoptosis, adhesion and activation. Its expression and secretion by until now an unknown mechanism are modulated by diverse molecules and are dependent on different physiological and pathophysiological conditions. By autocrine and paracrine actions, galectin-3 modulates many immune reactions and affects various immune cells, particularly those of monocyte-macrophage lineage. This is why galectin-3 has recently become an attractive therapeutic target. However, molecular mechanisms of its actions as well as regulatory mechanism of its expression and activation are still largely unknown. In this study, we show that lipopolysaccharide (LPS) provokes upregulation of galectin-3 expression on both gene and protein level in monocyte-like THP-1 cells, which can be inhibited by dexamethasone, but not with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs aspirin and indomethacin. Resting and LPS-challenged monocyte-like THP-1 cells do not have detectable amount of surface-bound galectin-3, but are able to bind exogenously added galectin-3 with the same capacity. Although galectin-3 is generally considered to be a pro-inflammatory molecule, here we show that the exogenously added galectin-3 does not affect interleukin (IL)-1 beta, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12p70 and TNF-alpha production in resting and LPS-activated monocyte-like THP-1 cells nor influences its own gene expression level in those cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据