A qualitative systematic review of studies using the normalization process theory to research implementation processes
出版年份 2014 全文链接
标题
A qualitative systematic review of studies using the normalization process theory to research implementation processes
作者
关键词
Implementation, Policy, Normalization process theory, Theory, Translational gaps
出版物
Implementation Science
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages -
出版商
Springer Nature
发表日期
2014-01-02
DOI
10.1186/1748-5908-9-2
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Towards a general theory of implementation
- (2013) Carl May Implementation Science
- From theory to 'measurement' in complex interventions: Methodological lessons from the development of an e-health normalisation instrument
- (2012) Tracy L Finch et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Understanding the management of early-stage chronic kidney disease in primary care: a qualitative study
- (2012) Tom Blakeman et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE
- Factors that promote or inhibit the implementation of e-health systems: an explanatory systematic review
- (2012) Frances S Mair et al. BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION
- Drawbacks and benefits associated with inter-organizational collaboration along the discovery-development-delivery continuum: a cancer research network case study
- (2012) Jenine K Harris et al. Implementation Science
- REsearch into implementation STrategies to support patients of different ORigins and language background in a variety of European primary care settings (RESTORE): study protocol
- (2012) Anne MacFarlane et al. Implementation Science
- Implementing a stepped-care approach in primary care: results of a qualitative study
- (2012) Gerdien Franx et al. Implementation Science
- Understanding Patients' Experiences of Treatment Burden in Chronic Heart Failure Using Normalization Process Theory
- (2011) K. Gallacher et al. ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE
- Integrating telecare for chronic disease management in the community: What needs to be done?
- (2011) Carl R May et al. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Evaluating complex interventions and health technologies using normalization process theory: development of a simplified approach and web-enabled toolkit
- (2011) Carl R May et al. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Provider experiences of the implementation of a new tuberculosis treatment programme: A qualitative study using the normalisation process model
- (2011) Salla Atkins et al. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Perceptions of general practitioners towards the use of a new system for treating back pain: a qualitative interview study
- (2011) Tom Sanders et al. BMC Medicine
- Exploring implementation and sustainability of models of care: can theory help?
- (2011) Della A Forster et al. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH
- Models of transitional care for young people with complex health needs: a scoping review
- (2011) R. Watson et al. CHILD CARE HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENT
- Opinion leaders and changes over time: a survey
- (2011) Gaby Doumit et al. Implementation Science
- The applicability of normalisation process theory to speech and language therapy: a review of qualitative research on a speech and language intervention
- (2011) Deborah M James Implementation Science
- Why is it difficult to implement e-health initiatives? A qualitative study
- (2011) Elizabeth Murray et al. Implementation Science
- Telehealth in practice: using Normalisation Process Theory to bridge the translational gap
- (2011) Deborah Morrison et al. Primary Care Respiratory Journal
- Rational development of telehealth to support primary care respiratory medicine: patient distribution and organisational factors
- (2011) David John Godden et al. Primary Care Respiratory Journal
- Development and formative evaluation of the e-Health Implementation Toolkit (e-HIT)
- (2010) Elizabeth Murray et al. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
- Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions
- (2010) Elizabeth Murray et al. BMC Medicine
- Delivering the WISE (Whole Systems Informing Self-Management Engagement) training package in primary care: learning from formative evaluation
- (2010) Anne Kennedy et al. Implementation Science
- What work has to be done to implement collaborative care for depression? Process evaluation of a trial utilizing the Normalization Process Model
- (2010) Linda Gask et al. Implementation Science
- A critical synthesis of literature on the promoting action on research implementation in health services (PARIHS) framework
- (2010) Christian D Helfrich et al. Implementation Science
- A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations
- (2010) Philippa Davies et al. Implementation Science
- Arduous implementation: Does the Normalisation Process Model explain why it's so difficult to embed decision support technologies for patients in routine clinical practice
- (2009) Glyn Elwyn et al. Implementation Science
- Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory
- (2009) Carl R May et al. Implementation Science
- An implementation research agenda
- (2009) Martin P Eccles et al. Implementation Science
- Process evaluation of infertility management in primary care: has open access HSG been normalized?
- (2009) Scott Wilkes et al. Primary Health Care Research and Development
- Beyond the limits of clinical governance? The case of mental health in English primary care
- (2008) Linda Gask et al. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- The Meaning of Translational Research and Why It Matters
- (2008) Steven H. Woolf JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Implementing clinical guidelines for bipolar disorder
- (2008) Richard. Morriss PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHOTHERAPY-THEORY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE
Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
SearchBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started