4.5 Article

Enforced expression of miR-125b attenuates LPS-induced acute lung injury

期刊

IMMUNOLOGY LETTERS
卷 162, 期 1, 页码 18-26

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.imlet.2014.06.008

关键词

Acute respiratory distress syndrome; Acute lung injury; miR-125b

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81372347, 81370174]
  2. Shanghai Committee of Science and Technology [134119a4900]
  3. Shanghai Pudong New Area Academic Leader in Health System [PWRd2010-01]
  4. Basic Research Program - Shanghai Committee of Science and Technology [11JC1410900]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), a severe form of acute lung injury (ALI) in humans, is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. Despite decades of research, few therapeutic strategies for clinical ARDS have emerged. Recent evidence implicated a potential role of miR-125b in development of ALI. Here we evaluated the miR-125b-based strategy in treatment of ARDS using the murine model of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced ALI. We found that up-regulation of miR-125b expression maintained the body weight and survival of ALI mice, and significantly reduced LPS-induced pulmonary inflammation as reflected by reductions in total cell and neutrophil counts, proinflammatory cytokines, as well as chemokines in BAL fluid. Further, enforced expression of miR-125b resulted in remarkable reversal of LPS-induced increases in lung permeability as assessed by reductions in total protein, albumin and IgM in BAL fluid, and ameliorated the histopathology changes of lung in LPS-induced ALI mice. Of interest, serum miR-125b expression was also decreased and inversely correlated with the disease severity in patients with ARDS. Our findings strongly demonstrated that enforced expression of miR-125b could effectively ameliorate the LPS-induced ALI, suggesting a potential application for miR-125b-based therapy to treat clinical ARDS. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据