4.5 Article

IL-15 and dendritic cells induce proliferation of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells from peripheral blood

期刊

IMMUNOLOGY LETTERS
卷 140, 期 1-2, 页码 59-67

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.imlet.2011.06.005

关键词

Dendritic cells; IL-15; Regulatory T cells; Proliferation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30772048]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing [CSTC 2006BB5066]
  3. Clinical Innovative Foundation of Southwest Hospital [SWH2006A003]
  4. Governor's Foundation for Excellent Talents of Science and Technology in Guizhou Province [(2005)230, (2009)31]
  5. Foundation of Guizhou Provincial Science and Technology Department [(2009)2221, (2011)2249]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells (Tregs) have recently been the subject of intense research due to their strong immunosuppressive effect. Increasing evidence suggests that IL-15 plays an important role in Tregs biology. Nevertheless, the mechanism by which IL-15 performs this function remains to be fully elucidated. To address this question, we isolated Tregs from human peripheral blood, and utilized IL-15, dendritic cells (DCs), or DCs combined with IL-15, to examine the proliferation of Tregs and to explore related molecular mechanisms. Here, we show that IL-15 can induce the proliferation of Tregs in the presence of DCs. The induction is mediated by DCs presenting IL-15 in trans to Tregs. Simultaneously, DCs-derived IL-2, regulated by IL-15, may also play a supportive role. After IL-15 withdrawal, IL-15 trans-endosomal recycling in DCs contributes to the proliferation of Tregs. The activation of Akt, Erk1/2 and STAT(5), and the degradation of p27(kip1) may be involved in this process. These findings might explain the proliferation of Tregs in the absence of IL-2 in vivo and provide a novel method to achieve large-scale proliferation of Tregs in vitro in order to obtain cell numbers sufficient for immunotherapy. (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据