4.6 Article

LAMP-2-deficient human B cells exhibit altered MHC class II presentation of exogenous antigens

期刊

IMMUNOLOGY
卷 131, 期 3, 页码 318-330

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2010.03309.x

关键词

exogenous antigens; human B cells; MHC class II presentation

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [T32DK007519, AI49589]
  2. Melanoma Research Foundation
  3. American Heart Association

向作者/读者索取更多资源

P>Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II molecules present antigenic peptides derived from engulfed exogenous proteins to CD4+ T cells. Exogenous antigens are processed in mature endosomes and lysosomes where acidic proteases reside and peptide-binding to class II alleles is favoured. Hence, maintenance of the microenvironment within these organelles is probably central to efficient MHC class II-mediated antigen presentation. Lysosome-associated membrane proteins such as LAMP-2 reside in mature endosomes and lysosomes, yet their role in exogenous antigen presentation pathways remains untested. In this study, human B cells lacking LAMP-2 were examined for changes in MHC class II-restricted antigen presentation. MHC class II presentation of exogenous antigen and peptides to CD4+ T cells was impaired in the LAMP-2-deficient B cells. Peptide-binding to MHC class II on LAMP-2-deficient B cells was reduced at physiological pH compared with wild-type cells. However, peptide-binding and class II-restricted antigen presentation were restored by incubation of LAMP-2-negative B cells at acidic pH, suggesting that efficient loading of exogenous epitopes by MHC class II molecules is dependent upon LAMP-2 expression in B cells. Interestingly, class II presentation of an epitope derived from an endogenous transmembrane protein was detected using LAMP-2-deficient B cells. Consequently, LAMP-2 may control the repertoire of peptides displayed by MHC class II molecules on B cells and influence the balance between endogenous and exogenous antigen presentation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据