4.3 Article

Induction of an anti-inflammatory human monocyte subtype is a unique property of glucocorticoids, but can be modified by IL-6 and IL-10

期刊

IMMUNOBIOLOGY
卷 217, 期 3, 页码 329-335

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.imbio.2011.10.002

关键词

Monocytes; Macrophages; Glucocorticoids; Cytokines; IL-4; Apoptosis

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [SU 195/3-2]
  2. IZKF (Interdisciplinary Centre of Clinical Research)
  3. IMF (Innovative Medizinische Forschung) of the University of Muenster

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glucocorticoids (GC) are the most widely used immunosuppressive agents in clinical medicine. Recently we showed that GC enhance survival of human monocytes and induce a specific anti-inflammatory monocyte subtype which actively induces resolution of inflammation. We now investigated if cytokines IL-4, IL-6 and IL-10, which, like GC, have mostly anti-inflammatory effects on macrophages, would have GC-like effects also on monocytes. Human monocytes were stimulated with either cytokine. GC or combination thereof, and resulting effects on apoptosis, adherence, migration, phagocytosis, ROS production and cell surface phenotype were determined. We found that IL-4, IL-6, and IL-10 had either less or different effects on various anti-inflammatory functions of monocytes compared to GC. As such, IL-4 and IL-6 alone did not delay apoptosis while IL-10 even enhanced it. However, IL-6 or IL-10 increased GC-mediated protection from apoptosis when applied together with GC. Thus, the potential of GC to induce anti-inflammatory human monocytes is unique and not mimicked by the investigated cytokines. However, IL-6 and IL-10 amplify GC-induced anti-inflammatory and pro-resolution mechanisms by enhancing survival of GC-induced monocytes and thus sustaining their function. This combined effect of GC and cytokines could be important for the physiological switch from amplification towards resolution phase of inflammation. (C) 2011 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据