4.3 Article

Adaptive PrimalDual Genetic Algorithms in Dynamic Environments

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSMCB.2009.2015281

关键词

Adaptive dominant replacement scheme; dynamic optimization problem (DOP); genetic algorithm (GA); Lamarckian learning; primal-dual mapping (PDM)

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [70431003, 70671020]
  2. National Innovation Research Community Science Foundation of China [60521003]
  3. National Support Plan of China [2006BAH02A09]
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) of U. K [EP/E060722/1]
  5. Hong Kong Polytechnic University Research [G-YH60]
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/E060722/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. EPSRC [EP/E060722/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, there has been an increasing interest in applying genetic algorithms (GAs) in dynamic environments. Inspired by the complementary and dominance mechanisms in nature, a primal-dual GA (PDGA) has been proposed for dynamic optimization problems (DOPs). In this paper, an important operator in PDGA, i.e., the primal-dual mapping (PDM) scheme, is further investigated to improve the robustness and adaptability of PDGA in dynamic environments. In the improved scheme, two different probability-based PDM operators, where the mapping probability of each allele in the chromosome string is calculated through the statistical information of the distribution of alleles in the corresponding gene locus over the population, are effectively combined according to an adaptive Lamarckian learning mechanism. In addition, an adaptive dominant replacement scheme, which can probabilistically accept inferior chromosomes, is also introduced into the proposed algorithm to enhance the diversity level of the population. Experimental results on a series of dynamic problems generated from several stationary benchmark problems show that the proposed algorithm is a good optimizer for DOPs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据