4.7 Article

Stability of Helicopters in Compliant Contact Under PD-PID Control

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS
卷 30, 期 6, 页码 1472-1486

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TRO.2014.2363371

关键词

Aerial manipulation; mobile manipulation; unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs)

类别

资金

  1. Office of Naval Research [N000141010737]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aerial vehicles are difficult to stabilize, especially when acted upon by external forces. A hovering vehicle interacting with objects and surfaces must be robust to contact forces and torques transmitted to the airframe. These produce coupled dynamics that are distinctly different from those of free flight. While external contact is generally avoided, extending aerial robot functionality to include contact with the environment during flight opens up new and useful areas such as perching, object grasping, and manipulation. These mechanics may be modeled as elastic couplings between the aircraft and the ground, represented by springs in R-3 x SO(3). We show that proportional derivative and proportional integral derivative (PID) attitude and position controllers that stabilize a rotorcraft in free flight will also stabilize the aircraft during contact for a range of contact displacements and stiffnesses. Simulation of the coupled aircraft dynamics demonstrates stable and unstable modes of the system. We find analytical measures that predict the stability of these systems and consider, in particular, the planar system in which the contact point is directly beneath the rotor. We show through explicit solution of the linearized system that the planar dynamics of the object-helicopter system in vertical, horizontal, and pitch motion around equilibrium remain stable, within a range of contact stiffnesses, under unmodified PID attitude control. Flight experiments with a small-scale PID-stabilized helicopter fitted with a compliant gripper for capturing objects affirm our model's stability predictions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据