4.6 Article

Conductivity and redox stability of double perovskite oxide SrCaFe1+xMo1-xO6-δ (X=0.2, 0.4, 0.6)

期刊

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
卷 168, 期 -, 页码 50-57

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2015.10.056

关键词

Ceramics; Inorganic compounds; Oxides; Electrical conductivity

资金

  1. EPSRC Flame SOFCs project [EP/K021036/1]
  2. UK-India Biogas SOFCs project [EP/I037016/1]
  3. SuperGen Fuel Cells project [EP/G030995/1]
  4. ScotChem SPIRIT scheme
  5. EPSRC [EP/K021036/1, EP/G030995/1, EP/K021036/2, EP/I037016/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K021036/1, EP/I037016/1, EP/K021036/2, EP/G030995/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of new double perovskite oxides SrCaFe1+xMo1-xO6-delta (x = 0.2, 0.4, 0.6) were synthesised by solid state reaction method. Synthesis of SrCaFe1+xMo1-xO6-delta (x = 0.2, 0.4, 0.6) were achieved above 700 C in 5% H-2/Ar, albeit with the formation of impurity phases. Introduction of calcium to Sr2Fe1+xMo1-xO6-delta (x = 0.2, 0.4, 0.6) was not successful in simultaneously improving the conductivity of these compounds, with a significant reduction in the formability observed with increasing calcium content. Phase stability upon redox cycling was not observed for SrCaFe1+xMo1-xO6-delta (x = 0.2, 0.4, 0.6). Redox cycling of SrCaFe1+xMo1-xO6-delta (x = 0.2, 0.4, 0.6) demonstrates a strong dependence on high temperature reduction to achieve high conductivities, with re-reduction at lower temperatures attaining between 0.1% and 58.4% of the initial conductivity observed after high temperature reduction. The conductivity of SrCaFe1+xMo1-xO6-delta in 5% H-2/Ar between 300 degrees C and 500 degrees C was around 73.5 Scm(-1). The reliance of these compounds on high temperature reduction is expected to limit their utility as SOFC anode materials, as the vulnerability to oxidation can have disastrous consequence for fuel cell durability. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据