4.4 Article

In-Vivo and Fast Examination of Iron Concentration of Magnetic Nano-Particles in an Animal Torso via Scanning SQUID Biosusceptometry

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON APPLIED SUPERCONDUCTIVITY
卷 21, 期 3, 页码 2250-2253

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TASC.2011.2107871

关键词

Antiferromagnetism; in-vivo; magnetic nano-particle; SQUID

资金

  1. National Science Council of Taiwan [98-2323-B-003-001-CC2, 98-2112-M-003-003, 98-221-E-003-001-MY2]
  2. Ministry of Economic Affairs [1Z970688-SBIR, S09800226-203-JAID]
  3. Department of Health [DOH98-TD-N-111-008, 99G0012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To determine the iron concentration of administrated magnetic nano-particles in animals is essential for evaluation of arrival efficiency in target regions in biomagnetism studies. In this work, a high T-c superconucting quantum interference devices (SQUID) biosusceptometry with a scanning coil set is developed. The measurement principal is based on the AC susceptibility of magnetic nano-particles, and the low noise of 8 pT/root Hz at 400 Hz is characterized in unshielded environment. The dextran-coated magnetic nano-particle of 50 nm in diameter is administrated intravenously into Wistar male rats to demonstrate the in-vivo and fast examination feasibility of this instrument. The in-vivo results of heart region and liver region explained the reasonable biological phenomenon of magnetic nano-particles in animals. Good correlation of concentration-time curve between the induction-coupled-plasma (ICP) and in-vivo examination by AC susceptibility measurement in rat liver region until 4 hours after injection of magnetic naoparticle validates the in-vivo measurement of iron concentration. After 4 hrs post magnetic nanoparticle injection, the phagocyted magnetic nano-particles in liver tissue shows antiferromagnetism properties and explain the difference between the low in-vivo intensity by AC susceptibility measurement and high intensity by ICP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据