4.3 Article

Serum resistant and enhanced transfection of plasmid DNA by PEG-stabilized polyplex nanoparticles of L-histidine substituted polyethyleneimine

期刊

MACROMOLECULAR RESEARCH
卷 23, 期 7, 页码 618-627

出版社

POLYMER SOC KOREA
DOI: 10.1007/s13233-015-3074-5

关键词

L-histidine substitution; PEGylated polyethyleneimine; serum resistance; transfection; plasmid DNA

资金

  1. Shiraz University of Medical Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To improve transfection of plasmid DNA as well as serum protein stability of polyionic complex nanoparticles of branched polyethyleneimine (bPEI), poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG)-stabilized nanoparticles were made from L-histidine substituted bPEI (PEI-Histidine) synthesized by Fmoc chemistry. The polymer was characterized by TNBS assay, H-1 NMR, GFC, potentiometric titration and elemental analysis of carbon and nitrogen, DNA condensation, and the stability against extracellular matrix (heparin sulfate) was investigated by dye exclusion and agarose gel retardation assays. The nanoparticles were characterized by dynamic light scattering-zeta potential analyzer. Cytotoxicity and expression of enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) were determined in hepatocellular carcinoma by MTT assay and fluorescent techniques. PEI-Histidine showed a reduced pK (a) without any significant loss of total primary amines. Plasmid DNA was condensed almost thoroughly with PEGylated polymers, either bPEI or PEI-Histidine, at lower critical N/P ratios. PEGylated PEI-Histidine showed the better resistance to heparin induced displacement and the lower cytotoxicity when it was compared to bPEI. Interestingly unlike bPEI, smaller and less positively charged nanoparticles were obtained from PEGylated PEI-Histidine at N/P ratio=2 that resulted in about 4 folds higher EGFP expression than bPEI without any significant cytotoxicity. These properties are consistent with the higher serum protein resistance and buffer capacity of PEGylated PEI-Histidine at endosomal acidic pH.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据