4.7 Article

A Kernel-Based Feature Selection Method for SVM With RBF Kernel for Hyperspectral Image Classification

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSTARS.2013.2262926

关键词

Feature selection; hyperspectral image classification; kernel-based feature selection; radial basis function; support vector machines

资金

  1. National Science Council, Taiwan [NSC 100-2628-E-142-001-MY3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hyperspectral imaging fully portrays materials through numerous and contiguous spectral bands. It is a very useful technique in various fields, including astronomy, medicine, food safety, forensics, and target detection. However, hyperspectral images include redundant measurements, and most classification studies encountered the Hughes phenomenon. Finding a small subset of effective features to model the characteristics of classes represented in the data for classification is a critical preprocessing step required to render a classifier effective in hyperspectral image classification. In our previous work, an automatic method for selecting the radial basis function (RBF) parameter (i.e., sigma) for a support vector machine (SVM) was proposed. A criterion that contains the between-class and within-class information was proposed to measure the separability of the feature space with respect to the RBF kernel. Thereafter, the optimal RBF kernel parameter was obtained by optimizing the criterion. This study proposes a kernel-based feature selection method with a criterion that is an integration of the previous work and the linear combination of features. In this new method, two properties can be achieved according to the magnitudes of the coefficients being calculated: the small subset of features and the ranking of features. Experimental results on both one simulated dataset and two hyperspectral images (the Indian Pine Site dataset and the Pavia University dataset) show that the proposed method improves the classification performance of the SVM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据