4.6 Article

Heterojunction-Free GaN Nanochannel FinFETs With High Performance

期刊

IEEE ELECTRON DEVICE LETTERS
卷 34, 期 3, 页码 381-383

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LED.2013.2240372

关键词

Fin-shaped field-effect transistor (FinFET); GaN; HEMT; heterojunction; MOSFET; nanochannel; subthreshold slope (SS); triple-gate; 2-D electron gas (2DEG)

资金

  1. Kyungpook National University
  2. Brain Korea 21
  3. Korean Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST) under National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [2012-0005671, 2012-0000627]
  4. MKE/KETEP [2011101050017B]
  5. World Class University program through the Korea Science and Engineering Foundation
  6. MEST [R33-10055]
  7. IT R&D program of MKE/KEIT [10038766]
  8. National Research Foundation of Korea [2008-0062617, R33-2012-000-10055-0, 2011-0016222] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heavily doped GaN nanochannel fin-shaped field-effect transistors (FinFETs) without heterojunction have been fabricated and characterized for the first time. Simplified pragmatical technology for GaN epitaxial growth and FinFET process was used to achieve nanodevices with a channel width from 40 to 100 nm and a gate length of 1 mu m. They exhibit excellent ON-state performance, such as maximum drain current of 670 mA/mm andmaximum transconductance of 168 mS/mm. Record OFF-state performance was measured: extremely low leakage current of similar to 10(-11) mA and source-drain breakdown voltage of similar to 280 V. The subthreshold slope of 68 mV/decade is close to the theoretical limit (60 mV/decade, so far achieved only in SOI MOSFETs) and leads to very high I-on/I-off ratio of 10(8)-10(9). The proposed heterojunction-free nanochannel GaN FinFET is a very promising candidate not only for high-performance and high-speed integrated circuits but also for high-power applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据